close



2015年01月31日 00:02

記者許逸群/台北報導

雞排妹Ili(鄭家純)個性向來直率、有話直說,不過也因此沾惹南投火鍋吃到飽上不少麻煩。她30日出席活動時被問及有關台北市長柯文哲日前失言,以及曾在網路「交戰」過的小歪變成同門師妹的事件,她變得相當保守,一概簡單回答不再想惹上是非。??雞排妹現場圖集!!

▲雞排妹不再談論他人。(圖/記者陳明仁攝)

台北市長柯文哲日前與英國交通部長Baroness Kramer會面時不慎失言,對此,向來對周遭時事話題相當的關心的雞排妹不願多談;而曾在臉書交戰過的小模小歪成為同門師妹,她也沒有多說感想,謹表示「不是師妹,說不是就不是」。雞排妹個性大轉變,不再如同以往有話直說,她笑說:「我現在發現,少說一點就會多賺一點。」

雞排妹日前到香港宣傳電影《台北夜蒲團團轉》,利用空檔時間到北帝廟拜拜。她笑說,當時請求神明保佑她2015年能夠賺到一個數目,不過才剛求完,她發現去年早就達成,便再重求稍稍提高數目。孰料身旁的小Call提醒她,求願達成8成就年菜餐廳 台北得還願,而8成就如同她去年所賺的金額,所以她又求了第3次,希望今年能賺進8位數,也擲到聖杯有望達成。

▲雞排鶯歌中秋烤肉食材妹出席活動的服裝相當性感。(圖/記者陳明仁攝)

(中央社記者劉麗榮台北3日電)行政院黨產會今天說,國民黨補齊黨工薪資明細等資料即可發薪。國民黨行管會主委邱大展說,薪資給付是法定義務,如按許可條件申請,等於棄械投降,會有很大後遺症。 不當黨產處理委員會下午表示,為顧及勞工權益,只要國民黨補齊黨工薪資明細等資料,黨產會審核過後,即可動用永豐銀行帳戶或台灣銀行本票支付黨工去年11月、12月薪水。 邱大展受訪表示,國民黨去年12月27日確實有提出申請,但是依法定義務申請,國民黨認為,勞工薪資給付是勞基法規定的法定義務,無需經過黨產會同意,即得由國民黨先行支付,再依據黨產條例報請黨產會備查。 邱大展說,但黨產會認定申請薪資給付是規範在黨產條例的許可條件裡苗栗火鍋推薦 平價,這是包藏禍心,故意曲解,分化黨中央與黨工,行政法院也認定是法定義務,若國民黨按許可條件申請,等於全盤皆輸,棄械投降,這會造成很大的後遺症。 至於黨產會針對台北高等行政法院審理中國國民黨、中央投資及欣裕台公司聲請停止執行事件裁定結果,決定不抗告。邱大展說,抗不抗告等抗告時間結束才知道,國民黨持懷疑態度,對顧立雄說的話沒有信心。 國民黨永豐銀行帳戶及銀行支票遭行政院不當黨產處理委員會凍結,向台北高等行政法院聲請停止執行,獲判行政爭訟終結確定前停止執行;黨產會不服提抗告遭駁回,黨產會又做出2項行政處分。國民黨再度提出暫時停止執行的行政訴訟案,預計1月11日開庭。 邱大展說,希望法院盡快做出裁定,讓國民黨資金解凍,這樣才能發放黨工薪水,讓員工過好年。他說,去年11月、12月都只發半薪,加上1月份的薪水和年終獎金等,積欠達新台幣上億元。1060103

2017-01-0503:00

CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University (NTU) president Yang Pan-chyr (楊泮池) was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te (林達德), who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua (許文華) said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan (閔明源) and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen (張上淳).“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang (郭明良) — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo (黃光國) accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh (嚴孟祿), a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million (US$208,617) Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council (now Ministry of Science and Technology) official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun (劉源俊), president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray (張慶瑞) and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

林口火鍋推薦
64B8D99FA48DF781
arrow
arrow

    santiab506tu 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()